Elon Musk's social media platform X refused to delete the video of Axel Rudakubana watching three minutes a few minutes before the murder. Although Australia and British authorities have proposed many times, Require.
ESAFETY, an Australian Internet regulatory agency, said on Friday that it "very sad" pointed out that the murderer watched the video on X (the video showed the situation where a bishop in Sydney was violently stabbed in April), although the regulatory agency had asked Delete the material from the website. A few months before the Sans Potter attack last summer, the platform was running on the platform.
After the Australian attack, companies such as Google, Microsoft, Snap, and TIKTOK immediately "quickly take action to cooperate with ESAFETY to ensure that it is impossible to visit Vicley stabbing videos from its platform." Further dissemination of materials, "the regulatory agency said." X CORP chooses not to delete the video from its platform. "
The video clip of a church stabbing bishop in Western Sydney circulated on the Internet in April, but X only blocks this video in Australia alone, which means that people in other parts of the world and local users of VPN can continue to watch this violence. Attack.
British Internal Affairs Minister Iveit Curoper said this week that the government is directly contacting X to ask them to delete the video from the platform. "The company should not make a profit by custody the content of children's life," she told the house.
On Thursday, 18 -year -old Rudakubana acknowledged that three young girls were killed in the theme dance class of Taylor Swift in Southport, and was sentenced to life imprisonment, at least at least the life imprisonment was sentenced to life imprisonment, at least 52 years of imprisonment.
After the killing incident, Musk tweeted many times, accusing British Prime Minister Kirr Stammer "prioritize the mosque instead of British girls in dance classes." Musk also enlarged the tweets of Tommy Robinson, a very right -wing semiration, saying that "Muslims are not challenged by police on the street and attacked any non -Muslims." These interventions caused him to accuse him of inciting tension and led to riots in the UK town last summer.
On Friday, Musk shared an article about the killing of Sans Potter and said "never forget."
But so far, he refused to intervene and forced his company to delete the video of Ruda Kubana watched. As of Friday afternoon, the video was still circulating on X.
The British "Financial Times" contacted X to ask why the video did not delete the video, but did not get a reply.
The court in the Donkakana case was informed this week that a search of a Lenovo tablet computer found in his home showed that in addition to a search on the day of attack, he has deleted the entire browser's historical record. Six minutes before he set off for murder, he searched on X "Mar Mari Emmanuel stabbing" on X.
When the police conducted the same search for X during the investigation, they found that it caused a post containing a video of the Sydney attack event three months ago.
The prosecutor also outlined Luda Kubana's online personal information and social media accounts, including his X account. As of Friday, his X account (the account was protected, only fans can see his post) have not been deleted.
The Australian regulatory agency seeks to take legal actions to force X to comply with the ruling that fully deletes the video in April. This move has differences in whether the government suppresses freedom of speech or protects social media users from harmful influence, which has caused differences in Australia. And violent content.
Musk criticized this decision and accused the electronic security "members" trying to review the Internet.
This has aroused a strong response from the country's political circles, including the Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, who said that X opposed to deleting the video of the video and criticized the billionaire's position. Sorry.
However, the court chose not to extend the ban on the video playback because X has taken "reasonable measures" to prevent the video from being played in Australia. This case is regarded as a potential test case that can be applied globally globally.
Electronic Safety Commissioner revoked the case in June and waited for the review of the Australian Online Security Law.
Hannah Murphy's supplementary report