The evidence of Lucy Letby, which is convicted, will be challenged by the expert group summoned by Dr. Shoo Lee, a Canadian pediatric science professor of pediatric sciences on Tuesday, that his own research constitutes part of the lawsuit case.
The 35 -year -old Letby was convicted for murder and tried to kill another seven other person prison in June 2016 in CHESTER HOSPITAL in the northwest of England.
The former newborn nurse failed in an attempt to challenge her faith in London's appeal court twice. Her new legal team is now making new challenges for the Criminal Case Review Committee (CCRC), which investigates potential abortion justice.
The Legby's legal team will reveal "major new medical evidence" after Lee and 14 international medical experts harmed the 17 cases of infant cases that were damaged in 17 patients.
It is understood that the experts did not find evidence of intentional injury, but other different causes of death. These discoveries will be the core of Letby attempting to review her case through CCRC.
The group will also challenge the prosecutor's statement, that is, Lyby murdered seven babies by pushing air into veins, causing air embolism, which is essentially a bubble that prevents blood circulation.
Li's air embolism study was used by prosecutors to help Layby's first trial from 2022 to 2023. He said his academic newspaper was published in 1989 and was prosecuted and his main expert witness Dewi Evans misunderstood the juror, causing jurors. Misled.
Letby's legal team said that the research of Lee checked the role of "lung" embolism, which pumped the oxygen pump into the baby's lungs, so it was not used to support the infant's claim in the infant injection of the baby in the vein.
Li, a honorary professor at the University of Toronto, has provided evidence to the Court of Appeal on behalf of Ryby's defense.
He told the judge that the "only signs" of air embolism in premature babies was "superimposed" pink blood vessels on pink or blue-cannot be diagnosed by any other skin discoloration.
This is important because the chief prosecution expert Evans and several witnesses told the original trial of Letby that the baby has shown other signs of the skin's "mottled"-Evans claims that this is her Evidence in the air into them.
In the newly published studies, Lee did not find evidence that the skin of the baby's skin was not accidentally injected into the vein in the vein.
Letby's legal team was led by human rights barrister Mark McDonald. He took over last year with the former nurse's trial lawyer Benjamin Mels KC.
David Davis, a conservative party member, will join his ranks, and he leads his leadership call for the Letby case to be reviewed as "obvious miscarriage justice".
It is understood that Professor Nena Modi, one of the most outstanding newborn scholars in the UK, is the former principal of the Royal Academy of Pediatrics and Children's Health, the panel of 14 experts, as well as other experts in the United States, Japan and Sweden.
Letby was exhausted and exhausted her right to challenge her faith in the Court of Appeals, without a lot of evidence, which was not available during her first trial.
However, she plans to submit an evidence document centered on CCRC's survey of 14 expert groups.
CCRC aims to complete most surveys within one year of receiving the application. If it believes that the judge may cancel the conviction, it has the right to send the case back to the court of appeal-but these cases usually take years to review them again in court.