U.S. judge says deportation may violate court orders | Donald Trump News

A U.S. judge denounced President Donald Trump's administration, saying reports of deportation to South Sudan appear to violate his previous court orders.

On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy held a virtual hearing in Boston, Massachusetts to impose an emergency motion on behalf of deported immigrants, reportedly on a ship flying to South Sudan.

He asked lawyers to determine where immigration is. He also said he could ask to turn around on the plane and call on the pilot to know about his court orders.

"It seems to be contempt based on my advice," Judge Murphy told Trump's Justice Department attorney Judge Elianis Perez.

Perez responded to Murphy's request for the plane to land, saying the Department of Homeland Security believes such information has been "categorized". Perez also said the Trump administration does not believe it violated Murphy's previous court orders.

In its recent annual report, the U.S. State Department accused South Sudan of “significant human rights issues,” including torture and extrajudicial killings.

However, the Trump administration has been looking for destinations abroad to send undocumented immigrants currently detained in the United States, especially those that are not accepted by their own country.

Judge Murphy said at a hearing Tuesday that the flight to South Sudan appeared to violate his preliminary ban issued on April 18, which prohibits immigrants from being deported to third-party countries that are not their own.

The ban requires the Trump administration to give immigrants a sufficient opportunity to appeal their dismissal.

Judge Murphy ruled that immigrants were simply seeking “an explanation of why such deportation could lead to their chances of persecution, torture and/or death.”

He cites the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which guarantees the right to due process: In other words, fair hearings were conducted in the U.S. court system.

Earlier this month, on May 7, immigration lawyers said their client definition would be sent to Libya, another country with significant human rights concerns.

Judge Murphy appointed by former President Joe Biden ruled that such deportation would violate his ban.

In Tuesday’s emergency court application, the immigrants’ lawyers highlighted how close the call for the incident was. When ordered to return, the immigrant in question was already sitting on the bus on the apron of the airport.

The emergency motion determines immigration only by its abbreviation and abbreviation in its country of origin, Myanmar and Vietnam.

But this explains what has allegedly happened in the past 24 hours and seeks immediate action from the court.

Lawyers claim an immigrant from Myanmar, known in court documents as NM, received a notice of dismissal on Monday. It determines the destination is South Africa. Court documents said within 10 minutes that the email was recalled by the sender.

A few hours later, a new evacuation notice was allegedly issued, this time naming South Sudan as its destination.

In both cases, NM refused to sign the document. Attorneys in the emergency petition indicated that NM had “limited English proficiency” and did not provide translations to understand the English documentation.

Although an NM lawyer said she was planning to meet him on Tuesday morning, by the time their date came, she was told he had been evacuated from his detention center, heading to South Sudan.

Emergency documents include a copy of emails sent to lawyers that were deported from family members.

The email began: "I believe my husband (deleted name) and 10 other people were taken to the Isabel Detention Center in Los Fresnos, Texas, and deported to South Africa or Sudan."

"This is not right! I'm worried about my husband and his team consisting of people from Laos, Thailand, Pakistan, South Korea and Mexico who are sent to South Africa or Sudan for their willingness to. Please help! They can't allow them to do so."