Earlier this week in Saudi Arabia, President Donald Trump made a statement that the White House called it the "primary address" a long-standing historical marker that shows that a particular speech is intended to convey presidential values. Or, in this case, lack. Trump’s message is that unlike past interventions by Americans, he did not take into account democracy or human rights when dealing with foreign countries. The only thing he cares about is America's interest. The host regime is related to the lack of human rights in the United States and its dismemberment in 2018 Washington postal Columnist, no doubt welcomes moral probation.
“In recent years, too many U.S. presidents have suffered from the notion that our job is to investigate the souls of foreign leaders and to use American policies to bring justice for their own sins.” “I believe sitting in judgment is God’s work; my job is to defend the United States and promote the fundamental interests of stability, prosperity and peace.”
Trump's statement means "the United States is completing national construction and intervention." New York era. "No Wilsonism in the speech" points out National CommentEditor-in-chief Rich Lowry declared the administration's abandonment of moral judgment as "Trump doctrine."
Two days later, in Qatar, Trump doesn't sound so cold. "We will protect this country. It's a special place for the royal family," he said. "This is great people, they will be protected by the United States." The U.S. State Department had previously criticized the ruling monarchy for violating human rights and imprisoning journalists, but Trump looked at their souls and found that they were indeed special. The tone of his hit sounded less like a cold-eyed businessman, more like John F. Kennedy who promised to defend West Berlin.
It seems that Trump does care about the internal characteristics of the regime he handles. Instead of following a foreign policy that completely ignores values, Trump has a clear preference for values in the context of the United States, which is historically abnormal or put forward in a less neutral way. He hopes to spread these values around the world.
No matter what you say about this policy, it is not oneMorality. The main difference between Trump’s doctrine and the promotion of traditional American values is that the former rather than seeking to implement a moral world order, but a desire to create an immoral order.
In his speech to Saudi Arabia, Trump condemned his predecessor for "providing you with lectures on how to live and how to manage your own affairs." Indeed, Trump did not teach other countries that suppress democracy. But his government is almost reluctant to condemn their internal actions.
Earlier this year, Vice President JD Vance scolded Europe for allowing too many immigrants and worked to break through at hate speech and far-right gatherings. "Germany Democratic States - Without democracy, things like the United States, Germany or Europe will tell millions of voters that their thoughts and concerns, their desires, their pleas for relief are invalid or not worth considering," he said. Trump called Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky a "dictator" and proposed an election before the Russian invasion was repelled.
In fact, the government makes human rights the core of a particular country’s diplomacy: South Africa. Earlier this year, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that he boycotted the G20 summit because it was held in Johannesburg. "South Africa is doing something very bad," he wrote. "Sought private property. Use the G20 to promote 'unity, equality and sustainability'. In other words: dei and climate change." Recently, Trump claimed: "South Africa is seizing land and treating certain classes very severely."
If you want to stand on human rights in just one country, South Africa seems like a strange choice: According to Freedom House, the country has been a "protagonist of human rights" since the end of apartheid, despite some deficits, but has been rated as "free" despite some deficits. But South Africa is in line with Trump’s obvious beliefs, which is reflected in hysterical rhetoric about treating Afrikaans, which is the most harmful ideology in the world. As a result, Trump granted refugee status to white South Africans, even as he deported other asylum seekers, including those facing prison or death.
It would be exaggeration to claim that Trump is motivated by his own values. The strong smell of corruption in his international dealings, especially with allies like Qatar, gave him a Boeing plane for others to use.
But this doesn't seem to be that Qatar has to bribe Trump to put the country under a U.S. military umbrella. The United States has a major air force base there, which lasts for a quarter of a century. The difference in how Trump talks about this military presence is compared to the resentment he often expresses to Europe and the Pacific bases. In describing the U.S. commitment to Gulf countries, Trump has not insulted our allies, or the stupidity of the former U.S. president of Lambast in giving up American protection, or demanding that these countries pay what he calls “membership dues” to keep it.
Trump described Boeing as a form of repayment he asked for, but a huge gift Qatar received for real friendship. The emirates have been “very, very good” and “want to do something” to show their appreciation. He repeatedly praised Katar as “good” to repay the U.S. security guarantee that a billion-dollar $400 million aircraft may or may not crawl on hearing devices.
The naked bribes in Qatar are not just about paying for the services provided. In Trump’s mind, Qatar is one of the good guys because it runs business in the way Trump does, not the way international free orders are. Trump's approach remains a judgment of foreign leaders. He just prefers bad guys.