Last week, Hamas senior officials and US officials told the media that they were willing to "dialogue" together. Hamas senior leader Mousa Abu Marzouk and US President Middle East Special envoy Steve Witkoff is most likely to test the waters of future diplomatic actions. It may be because they fully recognize that Israel and Israel's current war in the region may soon reach Iran, which is a bad news for all related people.

US President Donald Trump repeatedly stated that he intended to end his war in the Middle East and Ukraine, which harmed his greater plan to re -configure US global relations. Hamas took this opportunity to prove that it was still controlling Gaza and was still an important political group of the Palestinians.

In this case, we should take the sudden tendency of the United States and Hamas to "dialogue" and explore carefully, because this is possible and meets the greatest interests of all related people in the Middle East and other regions.

There must be a extensive gap between the two actors: Washington is deeply conspired in Israel's racial disaster in Gaza, and Hamas's resistance movement is widely regarded as terrorist organizations by most Western areas. But that is why they have to meet, talk and accurately determine the position of each other and the potential of stepping from militarism to peace. The ongoing ceasefire is an opportunity to start this process. This is why the three stages of the three stages should be the top priority.

Effective Israeli propaganda has long been a Western Hamas demon into a Lu CK and vicious terrorist organizations that want to destroy Israel. However, the reality is that Hamas has always been a successful Palestinian national political organization, because it combines three key developments supported by most 14 million Barstinians in the world: Resistance; political actionism, with national political plans supported by all Palestinian factions; and continuously discussing how to resolve conflicts with Jewish stateism peacefully with pragmatism.

Understanding Hamas and its position does not mean to formally recognize it, adopt its point of view, or avoid criticizing its armed forces, which usually reflects the global definition of armed resistance in the world, and sometimes it is in line with the terrorism and civilians to civilians. definition.

Like most liberation movements, Hamas also practiced militarism, resistance, terrorism, and political pragmatism at the same time. Understanding and separating these chains is the key to the road to conflict with Israel with Israel-that is, if the Israeli government really has a real and permanent peaceful person.

Now, the US-Hamas dialogue can clarify whether they are seeking peace. The lifelong interaction with Palestinian leaders and I show that the most important but unwell -popular attributes of the leaders of Hamas and the entire Palestinian Liberation Organization have always been that they have established a Palestinian country for a long time. The country will be adjusted by mutual consent in 1967. Concerned with Israel in 1967.

Hamas has officially expressed this view. Since 2002, this view has provided it to Pan-Arab Peace, Israel's Pan-Arab Peace. Last week, these positions reiterated in an interview with Basem Naim, a high -level Hamas official.

Peace decision has never happened, mainly because Israeli leaders have always ignored the proposal of Hamas and all other Palestinian groups.

Canadian scholar Colter Louweers has shown in his research that since the 1970s, the United States-Israel's contempt is how to implement the main obstacles to the consensus of the two countries that resolve conflicts based on international law. As he wrote in 2023: "In January 1976, the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) proposed the clause to negotiate this" two countries "consensus. With the support of Washington, Israel rejected the goodwill Palestine's proposal (...) Israeli descendants The rejection of bad beliefs in the United States is actually a "obstacle of peace".

这种拒绝主义沿着以色列无情的侵略反映了自1920年以来的犹太复国主义者- 以色列的目标，以驱逐尽可能多的巴勒斯坦人从祖先的土地上驱逐出尽可能多的巴勒斯坦人，并Exclusive Jewish sovereignty on all historic Palestine.

With the deterioration and expansion of the conflict throughout the region, from the side of Arabia, Hamas accepted the term. They are difficult, but reality. They demanded that Jewish reconciled nationalism defines its border and end the collisions in the region, while the Palestinians officially accepted the founding of the country in only 22 % of Palestinian.

All agreements to support peaceful war are difficult, and the policies of all parties are required to undergo strict changes. The end of the South African racial isolation regime and the end of the war in the United States in Vietnam and Afghanistan are some examples, which shows that it is difficult for peace to compose peace, but how important they are.

If WITKOFF talks with Abu Marzouk for their respective government, then I suspect that they are, now it's time to have a US-Hamas dialogue, and ignore the surrounding LLING calls, especially the important steps in the United States and Israel.

The most important thing is that any dialogue must avoid the errors of the Oslo process and other peaceful attempts in 1993. These errors replace the infinite discussion meetings of both parties, and the expansion and annex of the Israeli colonies continue to continue to make clear US support.

After expanding war and huge suffering, we must work overtime to take advantage of this opportunity to transfer the entire Middle East from its catastrophic militarist path to the future coexistence of all states.

The point of view expressed in this article is the author's own point of view, which does not necessarily reflect the editorial position of the Peninsula TV station.