Years before he became Vice President of the United States and passed the federal bureaucracy and constitutional breach of the Trump administration’s blitz against the Trump administration, JD Vance revealed his contempt for legal restrictions.

Vance predicts Donald Trump will be re-elected as president and advises him to "open fire, every middle bureaucrat, every civil servant in the executive state, to replace them with our people."

"Then when the court blocks you, a country like Andrew Jackson stands on the country and says: 'The Chief Justice has made a ruling. Let him enforce it now,' he told Jack Murphy (Jack). Murphy) Live podcast.

Whether the seventh U.S. president actually says it is still controversial, but that sentiment remains, and the Trump administration violated federal court orders to at least pass at the federal bureaucracy led by Elon Musk Falling into a subversive and destructive rampage to the Constitution.

Related: Trump's illegal power capture brings us closer to dictatorship

Government workers, state prosecutors and unions have all fought back against the lawsuits in a situation where Congress has not taken action to defend its own powers – challenging presidential orders to limit the constitutional rights of anyone born in the United States, federal funding freezes, and Measures to dismiss corruption watchdogs. Nearly 50 legal challenges have been raised over the past three weeks, an unprecedented court strike against the new government.

These lawsuits led to a series of court rulings. They put some executive orders from Trump to freeze some spending. They also restricted Musk, the so-called head of the Department of Government Efficiency, to send his staff to federal agencies of the United States International Development Agency (USAID) and the Department of Education as a means to limit their work, and even Close their work.

But it was soon apparent that the administration had violated some court orders, and its supporters attacked what they called "rogue judges" because of their rulings on Trump - and Vance described the court as president who enforced the will of the people Another bureaucratic obstacle.

This has sparked warnings from legal scholars, including the constitutional crisis that took place in Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the UC Berkeley School of Law.

"It's really scary to think that they'll disobey the court orders. If they don't do that, it would be a constitutional crisis different from anything this country has ever seen, because if the president can violate the constitutional law and violate the court orders, That's dictatorship,” he said.

"This is not a normal field. What we've seen in the first three weeks is unprecedented."

Judge John McConnell accused the Trump administration of intentionally disobeying orders and demanding that the administration restore billions of dollars in grants. Another judge, Loren Alikhan, accused the government of breach of its legal obligations because she ordered the office to conduct budgeting and management (OMB) to stop freezing spending.

Vance opposes X's ruling.

"If the judge tries to tell the general how to conduct military operations, it will be illegal," he wrote.

“Judges are not allowed to control the legal powers of executives.”

Musk called for an impeachment judge.

Trump won Thursday when the judge ruled that Musk made a proposal to almost all the salary in almost all eight months of the federal workforce, because they don't work now, they don't Work. The subject line for the email, “Fork on the Road”, is the same subject line he used in giving employees when he bought Twitter in 2022 and got rid of about 80% of his employees. Shortly after the deadline set by email, voluntary layoffs have been accepted by about 65,000 federal workers, and the union said the involuntary firing had begun.

White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt praised the rare court victory.

"This shows that the law will not ultimately outperform the will of the 77 million Americans who support President Trump and his priorities," she said.

But so far, courts have ruled against the Trump administration in pursuit of power.

The American Bar Association represents thousands of lawyers in the United States, condemning the Trump administration’s so-called “wide scope” of “the rule of law itself”.

"We have seen attempts to wholesale approval from departments and entities created by Congress without seeking Congressional approval to change the law," it said.

The ABA also condemned the condemnation of “incitement” of employees and social media posts “without considering their due laws and protections.”

"It's confusing. It might attract some. But it's wrong. Most Americans realize it's wrong. It also violates the rule of law," it said.

At least some of the floods of litigation may appear in the Supreme Court. In fact, the administration may want to see some cases reach the Supreme Court, which has a solid conservative majority after Trump appoints three of his nine judges in his first term as it attempts to More power over issues such as whom during the presidency ultimately controls the spending allocated by Congress.

But the gradual and appeals court process is unlikely to be swift before appealing to the Supreme Court, and Musk may have achieved much of what he has to do when undermining the U.S. Agency for International Development, the education sector and other federal agencies.

Then, the Supreme Court’s unpredictability has overturned the precedent of strike abortion rights.

Chemerinsky believes that the Trump administration will almost certainly have cases of birthright citizenship, spending freezes, and commissioners responsible for overseeing labor rights, consumer protection and equal employment opportunities because they violate federal law. He said the court may also order the government to retreat, trying to eliminate the various institutions created by Congress.

But what if the government follows Vance’s call to publicly violate the court’s appeal? This will establish a "constitutional confrontation that is different from anyone we've ever seen," Chemerinsky said.

"The court has limited ability to execute its orders. They can despise individuals outside the president. They can figure out who is responsible for executing the court orders and despise that person with a fine or imprisonment for civil contempt. However, in the United States, the court serves as cabinet secretary, prosecutor general The Secretary of Defense’s idea is unheard of in the United States,” he said.

"It's hard to imagine where we will be in four years. When you think about what happened in just three weeks, Donald Trump claims that the execution is huge, beyond any president's assertion. How much is the court allowed ? There is no way to know."