Two groups of unsteady federal investigating bureau agents sued the Ministry of Justice on Tuesday to prevent them from collecting information about tens of thousands of agents and other employees. They conducted a criminal investigation of Donald Trump. The case was conducted on January 6th.

The lawsuit is the list of the Federal Investigation Bureau (FBI) to compile and hand over a list of the list of agents engaged in these cases and their characters, and then review the ruling of the personnel engaged in these cases and their characters. Essence

In the document, the lawyer of the agent requested the Ministry of Justice to be prevented from collecting or disseminating lists. They added that the employees of the Federal Investigation Bureau will be retaliated and illegally using this information to fix the Federal Investigation Bureau, and they will violate the protection of civil servants.

These documents emphasize the uncertainty and fear of FBI for several days. After the temporary director Brian Driscoll, most of the turbulence occurred. He said in the internal memorandum that he was ordered to be expelled to the eight senior managers unless they retired in advance.

In the same memorandum, Driskor revealed that he had been instructed to determine the agent who had worked on the case on January 6, which caused the fear of the Federal Investigation Bureau's Washington headquarters, and other on -site offices in other on -site offices may be due to Cases assigned to cases and fired may be fired. president.

The turbulence of the Federal Investigation Bureau follows the turmoil of the Ministry of Justice. The Guardian reported on Tuesday that last week, more than a dozen prosecutors who worked for Trump's special lawyers had been fired in the president's personal direction.

According to people familiar with the matter, Driskor refused to recognize any efforts to start large -scale cleaning at the Federal Investigation Bureau. However, given that he and his deputy, Robert Kissane worked with the case on January 6, his position itself may be reviewed.

The first lawsuit filed by the special agents of the nine federal investigations was on behalf of up to 6,000 affected agents as a collective lawsuit. They either work in the case on January 6 or to Trump in Mar-A- Lago's improper criminal investigation on Trump's confidential documents. In 2022.

"The plaintiff is an employee of the Federal Investigation Bureau. He worked in the/or MAR-A-LGO case on January 6 and was told that they were likely to be fired in the near future (from February 3rd to 9, 2025). This kind of activity, "litigation said.

The lawsuit also showed for the first time that the questionnaire of the affected agent had been required to be completed. The investigation question asked the positions of the Federal Investigation Bureau employees, and whether they were part of the senior executives, such as the person in charge, the assistant director or the head of the department.

The survey also asked the specific responsibilities they were assigned to them on January 6. Specifically, they asked them if they arrested the suspects, helped the collection of evidence, submitted or reviewed the jury, interviewed witnesses, and led a search or testimony in the trial, and other actions.

The second lawsuit filed by the agent of seven federal agencies and the Federal Investigation Agency Agents requests federal judges to impose a temporary restriction order to prevent the Ministry of Justice from released the name of the agent on the list and urge them to stop the list of lists.

It also outlines the problems in the investigation, but added a strange detail, that is, some agents who were asked to complete the questionnaire had little or no job on January 6 cases. ask.

The lawsuit says: "Regarding information and beliefs, the Ministry of Justice is currently in a state of transitional chaos and cannot verify the accuracy of the basic information and data of its members."

The second lawsuit is a group of agents and technicians on behalf of an anonymous federal investigation bureau-proves how the internal censorship has become the internal review-Mark Zaid and Brad Moss, the famous Washington's famous National Security Lawyer, Executive Chairman Normeen National Democratic Defender Foundation