Take Taylor Swift’s songs from your Spotify queue, put the ice cream back into the fridge, and shoot in an angry diary entry: Liberals and Nationals may not break up after all.

The extraordinary consciousness of liberals and nationals was decoupled, their plans took a separate approach and worked hard, lasting 48 hours and 30 minutes, between 11.45 a.m. Tuesday, when David Lithdproud said he needed time to think, and Thursday at 12.15 p.m., when he was willing to provide him with another thing when he was willing to make a hurry for a press conference.

The announcement seemed to come together instantly. Some of the text journalists involved suggested an announcement will be made soon on their way to the news gallery. After the consultant slipped into the DMS, reporters sprinted in the corridor, but many still arrived after the national leaders began to speak, which was the rush.

In the media, LittleProud kept his red line for the league agreement, but the two talked again. He called the discussion "pragmatic", praised Lai's "leap of faith" and he would "allow them" - liberals - to find out what matters.

New Deputy National Leader Kevin Hogan compared the separation of the coalition to a "secession" on Tuesday, saying that when the parties "reunite from spending time separation" will be clearer and more focused.

So far, clarity and focus have been on supply this week.

Liberals and nationals, Rose and Rachel of Ospoll are still resting, but they are talking about tinkering. It's still...chaotic.

While Littleproud persisted with persistence "I can trust Susan, which is why she took a leap of faith today," a moment ago, his senior Senator Bridget McKenzie was seen by some as a driver of the breakup - she said she was worried about the trust of the liberals, which attracted the trust of the media in a letter to Michaelia Cash.

"I don't think it's in anyone's interest to leak these issues because it actually violates and undermines trust," Mackenzie said.

Both sides claim to be superior and morally high: some nationals claim liberals blinked at the negotiating table, while others say their junior partner looks like a fanatical spare time on a big stage.

Regardless of the framework, it is clear that those involved finally realized that most politicians appeared around noon Tuesday: an alliance of ten could decline gradually, and the nation faced the footnotes of the 48th Parliament in the singular and prepared AP era.

All along, Anthony Albanese's labor has given the air a clear break, plan for the next three years (or more), and watch off the court, and listen to Maxim never bothering your opponent when making mistakes. The breakup/reconciliation/relationship advisory session of the Liberal Party and the National is like a bad soap opera, labor chooses the moment to release the proposed parliamentary sitting calendar - a time for a less subtle thing while starting the ticking foot, when and when needed to make a difference to the government, and sticking it with the difference.

Liberal sources said Thursday was about compromise and consensus, and both sides provided some foundation for their earlier battles. Littleproud gave liberals more time to discuss, and Ley said the discussions would be a little faster than originally predicted.

That's a good thing. With Labor having over 90 seats, both the Liberal and the Greens have new parliamentary leadership teams, it is necessary to have a strong non-government party to hold Arbanes’ team responsible.

The dialogue line is open and there will be a free meeting in the next few days. Public venting, the pain of regaining the homeless partner, discussions in group chat about their annoying habits and quirky extended family will continue.

Everyone expects the quarrels to come together - maybe not because they are irresistible perfect love matches, but because both parties have too many failures in divorce.