Keir Starmer When the vote is held next month, a major rebellion aimed at cutting welfare is for a major rebellion, with dozens of Labor MPs preparing to vote on the measures.

Nadia WhittomeLabour MP Nottingham Easthaving been illuminating the reasons for her opposition to the government rebellion this morning, telling Plan Today that the plan is based on "very weak" evidence.

"Did it help to cut people's welfare? No one can answer this question," she said. "The government has not provided any evidence and wants members of Congress to vote on it without providing evidence."

She added:

In the long run, we can reduce our welfare budget, but this requires spending on our public services - on the NHS, on high-quality social housing, better wages, and more. Cutting people’s welfare will not help.

Whittome's back seat colleague Jake Richards However, the Defence Government told the plan:

The status quo does not work, and the welfare system is not suitable for the purpose.

Kemi Badenoch According to PA News, accusing Labor and reform leaders of demanding that people “provide unlimited child support to others” by abandoning the welfare cap for two children.

Her comment is here Nigel Farage It was announced that his party would repeal the cap as part of a series of spending commitments, including restoring winter fuel allowances and changing rules for tax-free allowances for married couples.

at the same time, Keir Starmer He said his administration is considering “all options” to undermine child poverty but has not promised to get rid of the cap.

Conservative leaders wrote in the Daily Mail that they accused Starmer and Farage of participating in the "competition" of welfare.

She said:

Obviously, Starmer and Farage now believe in attracting taxpayers – many of whom are struggling to raise their children or choosing not to raise them in the first place – providing unlimited child support for others.

That is unfair, it is unsustainable, not even compassionate. Welfare plagues people, builds dependence, and brings costs to everyone.

Badennock said both leaders’ comments on the cap indicate that they are “satisfied with making commitments they cannot guarantee” and believed that the Conservatives “will be a good party of money and fiscal responsibility again.”

The cap introduced by the Conservative Party in 2017 prevents General Credit The claimant receives additional benefits from the third or subsequent child born after April 5, 2017.
The hats have aggravated child poverty and have little impact on birth rates or family size, campaigners say.

this Children's Poverty Action Group It has been said that the abolition of the hat will lift 350,000 children out of poverty, meaning another 700,000 people are in poverty.

Rachel Reeves After rewriting fiscal investment rules, prepare to announce billions of pounds of additional spending in next month's spending review.

Report this story, the guardian's political correspondent, Kiran Stacey Write:

After reviewing the Ministry of Finance’s “Green Book”, the Prime Minister will launch additional capital expenditures, which determines how officials calculate the costs and benefits of the plan.

Critics say the rules tend toward economically productive areas of the country, and Reeves promises to publish the review the same day as the spending review.

The announcement was initially revealed by The Times as the minister is looking for ways to combat the threat of reforming Britain in the "red walls" in the north and central regions, which the Conservatives won in 2019 and was taken away by Labor last year. These areas may be hit by reduced sector spending, and Reeves will also clarify in the spending review.

In other news today, the government is setting off Funding allocation for construction maintenanceIn schools and hospitals throughout England, preachers say that children and patients should be safe and comfortable.

School Minister Katherine McKennel and shadow salary prime minister Richard Houghton In the early hours of the morning media, so we will hear from them soon. And, Farage announced that UK reforms are now accepting donations from Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.

After a moment, more about all the above, but first, here are some other developments:

• In a warning from the rights group, the UK is on the verge of signing a £1.6 billion trade agreement with the Gulf State, which does not make any specific provisions on human rights, modern slavery or the environment. The agreement with the Gulf Cooperation Commission, including countries in Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, is in contact distance, bringing it to a fourth deal after it reached a state agreement with the United States, India and the European Union.

• Andrew Bailey urged the British government to stay in touch with the EU as he warned that the breakdown of global trade would make it harder for the Bank of England to control inflation. The bank's governor said in a speech in Dublin on Thursday that a stronger relationship between London and Brussels could "maximize the negative impact of Brexit on trade".

• Kemi Badenoch accuses labor and reform leaders of demanding that people “provide unlimited child support for others” by lifting the cap on two-child welfare. Conservative leaders wrote in the Daily Mail that they accused Starmer and Farage of participating in the "competition" of welfare.

• Nigel Farage launched a video of the second attack on Anas Sarwar and accused the Scottish Labour leader of being "racially obsessed" and gradually escalated more and more personal lines ahead of the critical Holyrood by-election. Hamilton's central seat, the movement of Lackhall and Stonehouse is rapidly developing into a head-to-head game between the two leaders. British reform ads erroneously claimed that Sarwar had promised to prioritize Pakistani communities and now formal complaints were made to the metapopulation of Scottish Labor and SNP.

• A finance minister suggested that “millionaires” should not receive “government’s energy costs.” Darren Jones said winter fuel payments will be “still targeting those who need it most.”

• A human rights charity claims treatment of autistic people known as governments may be a violation of equality laws. "The deep concern is the potential ongoing failure to collect and analyze data on protected characteristics of persons in prevention, which constitutes data on ongoing non-compliance with its public sector equal obligations," said the Rights and Security International (RSI) in a previous letter to the Ministry of the Interior.