(Editor's Note: The other aspects of the dispute are added from its original version.)
The dispute between Mycarrier and Project44 (P44) entered the court last week-last week-last week-last week, two key requirements of lawyers: MyCarrier's contracts between Ebis and APIS violated the company's contract contracts that violated the company's contract contract This problem is related to the EBOL (P44) of MyCarrier and P44, which is a step required by MyCarrier.
At the three -hour hearing of the Tellawa School Court held in Wilmington, because the P44 has been included in the state in the state, and because the contract requirements of the two parties resolve the dispute, the real -time problem is that the P44 requires a temporary ban. The request stops the development of mycarrier.
Project44 said that this is the largest API network in transportation. I hope that MyCarrier's TMS is aimed at most of the carrier than the truck to prevent P44 from competing with Ebool.
The two companies are operating in accordance with a five -year agreement, which enables MyCarrier to sell certain P44 products. The transaction was signed in August 2023. But the relationship between the two companies far exceeds.
In the initial lawsuit mentioned last summer, MyCarrier tried to prohibit some services provided by P44 from suspending P44 to suspend the Sycarrier's access to the contract. This is the basis of the original legal lawsuit mentioned on July 1. A lawyer in P44 said that the original ban of MyCarrier had been withdrawn, and the ban in front of the Trav4 court was only P44 required to be unwilling.
The core of P44 was proposed in the request submitted in August P44, and then proposed in the summary of December.
"At the same time, all parties are negotiating contracts, which limits the ability of MyCarrier and P44, and limits anything similar to P44. MyCarrier plans to establish an independent system to replace P44 and avoid the use of P44 P44 And avoid using the P44 ban request: "The rise in prices will increase during the five -year term of the contract. "" After the P44 that intended to seduce the wrong commitment without competition, MyCarrier developed a competitive Ebool product (the product that P44 has provided in the service kit licensed by the MyCarrier), so it can directly provide customers with electronic bills The valuable function, not the first step in the P44-18 months is to gradually introduce the same functional system as P44. "
The only testimony in the court comes from the company's lawyer: Lazar Raynal of the King & Spalding Law Firm of P44 and Jeffrey Simes representing MyCarrier's Goodwin Proorter.
The case was tried in front of Judge Catherine McCord McCondon. In view of the role of Tellawa, due to favorable laws and tax policies, it has become a leading country established by the company, so the court is the location of many famous courts. One year ago, because the two parties were about to conduct trials and in ancient times, the dispute over OMNI's acquisition was completed, so the dispute between the positive air (NASDAQ: FWRD) and Omni Logistics was resolved.
McCondmock recently heard a case involving the Elon Musk salary plan. At the end of myCarrier and P44 on Thursday, she did not issue a decision from the bench.
Cutting into the argument, Renar accused Mycarrier's work behind P44, which obviously violated the contract between the two companies. MyCarrier did not propose the questioning of the project, but Sires said that the EBOL (P44) Ebol (P44) Ebol, especially its ability of the P44 Out of the necessary job.
When "nerve" was arranged in his oral speech, Raynal had a presentation, including the video clip in the recording during the discovery process.
The presentation also includes screenshots of email screens, including the screenshot of Michael Bookout, CEO Michael Bookout to P44 CEO Jet McCandless. Reservations say that MyCarrier "will never be established behind you. We have always expressed free to your services. P44 is a great accelerator."
According to the testimony of Raynal quoted, CEO once said: "I have no intention of competing with P44." "This will make them go directly to the carrier without using them. "
Among the three -hour testimony, one of the most noteworthy moments is Raynal's excerpt of the co -founder Chris Scheid, the co -founder of mycarrier reservation. In Rynal's inquiry, he attended a meeting of agency projects, and SCHEID suspended for a long time before answering.
"This is the person responsible for the project. He cannot answer a simple direct question with a simple direct answer."
McCandless said in his own testimony that MyCarrier's P44 service price discount price, because of the MyCarrier transaction, will obtain P44 data that will provide value beyond the contract price.
Slide films also include screenshots of the internal MyCarrier memo of the agency project. The memorandum is that the goal is to "gradually introduce a proxy system that can ultimately replace the P44 system."
Although there is no extensive discussion, disputes between P44 and MyCarrier are involved in the third place in the third place in late December involving the transactions between the competitive supply chain platform of the Georgian Federal Court SMC3 and MyCarrier to provide services similar to P44.
Another file introduced by P44 shows the idea of MyCarrier, and then responded by the imitator in his speech: P44 ebol has technical problems.
In the internal emails on September 27, 2023, the John Hess of MyCarrier summarized the dialogue between Mycarrier executives, as a motivation for agency projects A email. The top of the list is: "Due to technical debt, insufficient investment and customer focus, P44 has been unstable."
The open court of P44 Ebol (P44 EBOL) used by the LTL carrier is very harsh. He said that the main operators of the LTL OELD DOMINION (NASDAQ: ODFL) and Estes closed the use of P44 ebol. "Because it is not set for LTL," Simes said.
Sims said that P44 "I don't want to do what we ask them to do, unless we can solve these problems, we will not move forward."
P44 lawyers said that the two LTLs quoted by the imitator continued to use P44 Ebool.
Sims said that Ebool was "not complicated" and it was not a tool for customer charges.
"So why do MyCarrier encounter all these troubles and provide Ebols for a minority party?" Sims said. "Because those carriers want it. Mycarrier has served these operators, and Project44 did not supply it in a way to work (Ebool)."
According to Simes, whether this is a problem to solve it on MyCarrier. He said, "We are not sure if they are committed to this space."
The dispute is extensive, so that the description of the current state of the relationship between the two companies is inconsistent.
P44 lawyers said in an email sent to Freightwaves that they can still interchange the product through mycarrier access to P44 Ebol/LTL. Due to the dispute, the contract signed the contract was not canceled.
However, the imitator said in an email to Freightwaves that although P44 products can still be provided by MyCarrier, the transaction with SMC3 is designed to replace P44.
He also said that the dispute is undergoing arbitration and a status meeting will be held this week.
More articles from John Kingson
The federal appellation level in the Western Express in the "Water Wall" case is overwhelming, and ATA thinks it is important.
The driver solves the collective lawsuit by Lytx monitoring and data collected through CAB
Connected, the key supply chain software theme of generating AI influence, located in NRF '25
The MyCarrier Trade Court claims to violate the contract Project44, which appears on FreightWaves.