The Duke of Sussex said it was "impossible" to bring his wife and children back to the UK after legal challenges to personal security, and revealed that he would "love" reconciliation with his family.

Prince Harry said in an emotional interview with the BBC that his father, King Charles, would not speak to him “for something safe” but said he wanted to reconcile because life was “precious” and he didn’t know how long his father, who was diagnosed with cancer, would survive.

"For the time being, it's impossible for me to bring my family back to the UK safely," Harry, 40, said in his current California.

He added: "I can't see the world bringing my wife and children back to England...I love my country. Despite what some people do in that country. I've always done it. I miss Britain. I'm really sad that I can't show my home to my children."

Harry tried to overturn changes in his security regulations, and in the UK, it was carried out after he and the Duchess of Sussex withdrew from royal duties in 2020.

He was offered "customized" security, which he considered to be inferior and claimed to authorize the royalties and public figures of the Executive Committee (called RAVEC) without conducting a Risk Management Committee (RMB) before making a decision that violated its own reference clause.

He insisted that his father could help with the problem, although he did not ask him to intervene. “I can only come to England safely if I am invited, with my father having a lot of control and ability in his hands.

"Ultimately, it can be solved by him, not by intervention, but by pause and allow the experts to do the necessary things and do the rmb," he said.

It is understood that it is constitutionally inappropriate for the king to intervene when the government is considered and examined by the court.

Although the royal family provided representation and comments on the RAVEC decision, Friday's verdict showed that the chairman of the RAVEC committee was the decision-maker who provided security. The ruling said that the Royal Private Office and the Private Secretary should be consulted on the practicality of the protection measures.

Harry called on Prime Minister Keir Starmer: "It's all initiated under the leadership of the previous government. There's a new government now. I described me and they knew it was a good old-fashioned agency sewing. That's it."

When asked if the Prime Minister should “intervene”, he replied: “Yes, I want to ask the Prime Minister to intervene.

“I would ask the Home Secretary Yvette Cooper to look at this very, very carefully and I would ask her to review Ravec and its members because if it was an expert body, what would be the role of the royal family if it did not affect their family members?”

The Prime Minister was "very reluctant" to participate in the decision on Harry's security, a senior cabinet minister said Friday night. Pat McFadden told Sky News: "I don't think he's willing to make a judgment on someone's personal security needs. There's a reason we have experts doing this, and I'm not sure any politician says that that person needs this level or level of security is a good idea."

On the rift of his family, Harry said: "There are a lot of differences between me and my family, the difference. This status quo, this has been going on for five years, because human life and safety are the symptoms. It's the only thing left.

“Of course some members of my family will never forgive me for writing books, and of course, they will never forgive me for a lot of things, but… I would love to reconcile with my family.

"It's meaningless to keep fighting. Life is precious. I don't know how long my father has been. He won't talk to me because of this security. But it's a pleasure to reconcile."

He added: "It's all up to them if they want to."

Harry said that although he had to "I have to" leave the "institution", he could never leave the royal family.

He continued: “Whether I am in an official role or not, it has nothing to do with threats, risks and impacts on the UK’s reputation.

He claimed that during the court disclosure, he “discovered that some people wanted history to repeat, which was dark”. When asked what he meant, Harry refused to answer.

"Ravec's ability to make decisions outside of his own policies and the so-called political sensitivity of my case have prevailed, due to the needs of the court. The court decided to delay this."

“It all comes from institutions that prey on my mother, which openly campaign for our safety and continue to incite hatred against me, my wife and even our children while protecting the power they should take responsibility.”

He told the BBC that the court's ruling "destroyed" him, adding: "The loss to the person who decided was not too much of a loss, as if it was OK. Is this a victory for them? I'm sure some people, most likely people who want me to hurt me, (who) thinks it's a huge victory."

He said he would not seek further legal challenges, saying Friday's ruling "proves that there is no way to win the challenge through the court."

A Buckingham Palace spokesman said: "All of these issues have been repeatedly and carefully reviewed by the court and the same conclusions are drawn every time."