The guardians have learned that ministers will rethink changes in copyright law to further concessions to artists before voting in parliament next week.

Technical Secretary Peter Kyle said the proposal to introduce an exit system that introduces copyright rules is no longer his preferred choice, but one of the options to be considered.

The proposed changes will allow AI companies to train their models without permission using copyrighted jobs, which were criticized by creators and publishers unless the owner opts out. High-profile artists including Paul McCartney and Tom Stoppard supported the campaign against change.

"We're listening to consultations and we're absolutely determined to do that. We're not going back to the first one. We're moving forward," Kyle said.

"We can't pretend that we can ban training in other countries that have their own copyright laws, but we can build a system that works in the UK. So far, some elements of the consultation have not even appeared in the debate."

“We will work to come up with viable solutions to very complex issues of how we can make the creative industry and the UK AI companies thrive. We will report transparency and licensing issues to Parliament and try to find some common basis that we can agree on.”

Ministers changed their copyright law consultations by opting out system as their “first choice,” but government sources said Kyle is now looking at different suggestions more broadly.

The government is particularly interested in encouraging licensing agreements between AI companies and creators to ensure creators pay for their content.

But campaigners fear ministers may rebuild a free system rather than requiring AI companies to comply with existing copyright laws. Government officials said the law needs to be changed to attract AI investment into the UK and give creators control over how future content is used.

"I'm glad to hear that the government no longer regards opt-out proposals as a preferred option, but … in order to... make this change in any meaningful way, it must include the government's explicit commitment to protect the copyright holders."

Next week, members of Congress will vote on the Data Bill, which has been used by critics including Lady Kidron, to derail the proposed exit system. Kyle amended legislation aimed at restoring critics on Thursday by committing to conduct an economic impact assessment of different potential changes, including exit and licensing systems.

Ministers have had a political dispute over opposition amendments to the Data Bill. Both the Liberal Democrats and conservatives are considering bans on social media under the age of 16, a cause that has previously attracted support from workforce MPs.

Sources say the Conservatives are also developing an amendment to record people’s sex as part of the digital verification process. The Supreme Court ruled last month that the term “woman” was defined by biological gender, a labor source called “naked attempts to reopen sexual pain” to gender and gender.

The Data Act faces further obstacles when the data bill returns to the upper room. Kidron will restore her copyright amendment, while House of Lords Free Technology spokesman Tim Clement-Jones said there is a possibility of completely removing the bill. He said transparency concessions must be made or AI companies are required to reveal which copyright-protected content is used to create their products.

The government’s proposal to conduct an economic impact assessment of copyright changes within 12 months of the adoption of the Data Bill has also raised concerns that this could push the process toward the end of the workforce in 2029.

"The world is growing very fast and the government is moving very slowly," said Owen Meredith, CEO of the News Media Association, whose members include The Guardian. “The delay means a change to the underlying copyright framework that will not be realized until the end of the tail of that council.”

Kidren said clarifying the four-year delay in the AI ​​copyright system is a "completely insufficient time frame." “The creative industry will die at their feet at that time.”