The campaigners say its risk is taken to court again if the UK government’s decision in the upcoming spending review does not match the net goal of zero climate.

Principal Rachel Reeves will conduct a spending review on the rest of this council on Wednesday. Many sectors are facing deep commitments amid ongoing economic uncertainty and Labor’s commitment to boost defense spending.

Energy Minister Ed Miliband has been fighting for the promised £13.2 billion in insulation as experts and charities warn that failing to insulate luxury homes in the UK would destroy winter fuel payments for many pensioners. There are also some questions about the funding of GB Energy, a company that invests in green energy and supports agriculture and flood control.

Friends of the Earth's campaign group, successfully incorporated the last Conservative government into its clean plan, and said it would take legal action again if Reeves' plan appears to be insufficient.

The High Court ruled that the previous government failed to develop a reliable plan to achieve the legally binding goal of reaching net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 and ordered the minister to propose a comprehensive plan for climate action. The responsibility now falls on the labor force before October 29.

Friends of the Earth wrote a letter that, according to Guardian, Keir Starmer reminded him of the High Court’s request and warned that any major cuts by Reeves to promote clean energy or reduce emissions could be subject to legal challenges given the ruling.

"Decisions made as part of (spension review) could greatly affect the government's ability to comply with court orders," said Jamie Peters, the organization's interim CEO.

Mike Childs, a friend of geoscience, policy and research, added: "The government has a legal responsibility to achieve climate goals - no political maneuver can change this. As the planet has warmed to dangerous levels, extreme weather is expensive for life and livelihoods, the current and future prosperity of Britain will be balanced on it to ensure the range on it to ensure its distance, to ensure its distance, and to ensure its range and to ensure its range and to rely on the planet.

He added that spending on climate measures now will reduce the cost of extreme weather such as droughts, floods and storms. “The Prime Minister is not contradicting the future of the planet in her upcoming spending review.”

Reeves this week announced £15 billion in public transport outside London, which would be based on £113 million in capital projects and infrastructure.

But there is no such guarantee for the future of £13.2 billion in insulation. Ed Matthew, UK director of UK climate change IQ E3G, warned that if Labor fails to help people with high energy costs by enhancing renewable energy and insulated houses, it will provide more impetus for the right-wing populist reform party.

"So far, the Labor government is not enough to be of the importance of a green economy in stimulating economic growth. This is mainly due to the 10 results of trying to appease potential reform voters. However, this strategy has backfired. These voters prefer renewable energy because they will enhance energy independence and lower energy bills."

He said that if Reeves fails to invest in the green economy, it will lose a crucial opportunity, which last year grew 10%, three times that of the remaining economies, according to recent research by the CBI.

“Failure to concentrate the clean economy in their capital expenditure plans would be an act of economic self-harm and undermine their political destiny,” Matthew said. “Reeves must now bring the biggest boost to the clean economy in British history in spending comments. It’s green growth or bankruptcy.”