Last week, the Supreme Court prevented Donald Trump from continuing to use ancient wartime laws to deport Venezuelan immigrants, but after the government sent hundreds of people in this way in prison in El Salvador.
In a 7-2 ruling, the Justice dropped the ruling of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and noted that it took a long time for the lower court to consider issuing an emergency restraining order to prevent a group of immigrants under the Foreign Enemy Act. Most found that the Trump administration did not give any dismissal notice to detainees, nor did it give information on how to challenge them, and sent the case back to the Court of Appeal for further litigation.
Fifth Circuit Judge James Ho is a Trump-appointed person, widely regarded as a potential favorite for the High Court seat if universally recognized as available - not satisfied with that. He registered disappointment with Tuesday's consent, and the Fifth Circuit added the case to the case file, according to the Supreme Court's request.
This is an excellent writing designed for the audience. If there is any doubt about this, Ho apologizes directly to Trump several times, which shows that the Supreme Court is treating him unfairly. Ho is given to the court because the court stipulates that motions and orders are always open, but the court expects judges to be "available 24 hours a day". As the government claims, he appears to be thinking that the petitioner is a member of the terrorist gang.
"The petitioner was designated as a member of the designated foreign terrorist organization Tren de Aragua and should not be allowed to proceed in this appeal," Ho wrote.
"As an inferior court, it is our responsibility to comply with the Supreme Court's ruling - whether we agree to them or not. We don't have to like it. But we have to do so." "So, as directed by the Supreme Court, I agree to today's order to speed up our consideration of the matter. But I wrote to say that I have sincere concerns about how the District Court judges, the President, and other officials are treated in this case."
Huo insists that the Fifth Circuit is the right to reject an emergency appeal in the case, and it is reported that Venezuelan immigrants are loaded on buses and deported under the Alien Enemies Act, which could be the deportation of El Salvador without a fair opportunity to be dismissed. He believes the district court was asked to comply with a "clearly unreasonable schedule" (42 minutes) to stop deportation.
As the Supreme Court pointed out last week, the petitioner first requested a temporary restraining order at 12:34 a.m. on April 18. They then filed a lawsuit at 12:48 pm to seek a decision or meeting of the order by 1:30 pm, and the petitioner quickly appealed the order, issuing an interim order to the Fifth Circuit and the High Court and the High Court and the High Court and midnight on 19 September.
The Supreme Court ruled in a ruling last week: “The inaction of the District Court is not 42 minutes, but within 14 hours and 28 minutes – an injunction with an imminent, serious, irreparable threat of harm that refuses detainees.”
Ho is full of troubles about it - not only because he believes the Trump administration should respond to an emergency petition in order to immigrate imminently from the country to El Salvador prison, or another intentionally cruel place. (Trump reportedly only deported Asian immigrants to South Sudan.)
The judge wrote: "The clock starts at 12:34 am, not only does it ignore the clear instructions of the (district) court and respects the government's right to respond. This also ignores the fact that the court starts the clock at - 12:34 AM"
"We seem to forget that this is the District Court, not the Danny's court," he continued. "This is the first time I have heard anyone suggesting that district judges have a responsibility to check their docks at all times during the night, just in case the party decides to file a motion."
He added: "If this is to be a norm, then we should say this: Hereby hope is available 24 hours a day - and the judicial meetings of the U.S. Court and the judicial meetings of the U.S. Court should ensure that Congress obtains the necessary resources and personnel to ensure competitors in every region in every region across the country, if this is a special treatment. Aragua - we should stop pretending that Mrs. Justice is blindfolded."
As Patrick Jaicome, a civil rights litigant at the Center’s Judicial Institute, noted, in addition to the HO’s choice to provide “biased statements” about the petitioner being a gang member, “his complaint about court time is also confusing because 28 USC 452.”
"All courts in the United States should always be considered open for the purpose of submitting appropriate papers, issuance and return procedures, and motions and orders," the statute reads.
He apologized to Trump again.
"The District Judge is not the only public official to receive comments in this case," he wrote. "Recall why the District Court has established a 24-hour application deadline. The court firmly believes that the government should have the right to comment before any ruling is issued. This is correct."
Ho continued: "It goes without saying that the president and his executive officers should be respected by the courts regularly, including other presidents and officials."
Then, he wrote that Barack Obama “tryed to humiliate members of the Supreme Court by devaluing the recent ruling” - referring to Obama saying that the 2010 court’s 2010 citizenship ruling would “open for special interests to be … spent unlimited in our elections.” (Does it.)
Ho added that Bill Clinton is linked to the sexual harassment investigation. (Clinton resigns instead of strikes in the Supreme Court.)
"However, I suspect any court would deny the right of these presidents to comment in any pending cases where they are parties before they issue any rulings," Hu concluded. "Our current president deserves the same respect."
The federal court is not Denny's, but Fifth Circuit Judge Ho cooked the Grand Slam for Trump.