Increasingly popular healthcare savings strategies could make greater profits under the Republican tax bill
A financial planner said the Republican tax bill was "one of the most tax-effective retirement tools to adopt, just to start it further." - MarketWatch Photo Illustration/Istockphoto

Although Republicans decided to cut funding and tighter restrictions on low-income health insurance, they wanted to expand rules for accounts aimed at paying for health care, a tool for retirement plans that would allow wealthier families to align wealthier families.

The tax bill filed from the House Collection Committee this week is hundreds of pages, but it will use part of the provisions to keep healthy accounts.

look: Trump's major tax bill is in danger. That's why some people in the Republican Party have become cold feet.

Don't miss: Brett Arends believes that the United States should have more salt on the U.S. tax cut menu. More.

Under the bill, people can invest more money in these tax-promoting accounts, and working older people will have more time to contribute. It will also expand the types of healthcare plans that can use these accounts and allow users to purchase their gym membership with their account money.

"If passed, it can help high-income clients shelter more income and provide more space for young families and small business owners to save (inevitably) future health care costs," wrote Craig Toberman, partner at Toberman Becker Wealth in St. Louis.

Toberman added in a phone interview with MarketWatch that the Republican tax bill is “one of the highest retirement plans adopted by the most tax-collected retirement plans and further initiated.”

DeVenir, an investment solution for HSA accounts, said that by the end of last year, more than 39 million HSA accounts had nearly $147 billion in assets. DeVenir data shows that the balance of collective assets in 2024 increased by nearly 19% compared with the previous year.

However, the potential changes in HSA are one of the latest developments in the recurring story of rising health care costs in the United States

Republican tax and expenditure bills are not a transaction, not a long-term transaction. One reason is the debate about Medicaid funding and eligibility requirements. Democrats and other critics say millions of Americans may unfairly lose their health coverage, while Republican advocates say the cost of the program must be controlled.

Republicans also don’t seem to be inclined to expand enhanced tax subsidies for health insurance plans people buy in the Affordable Care Act Exchange. Meanwhile, insurance premiums continue to rise; last year, the average household premium through work rose 7% to $25,572, according to KFF.

So it's not easy to see whether a possible change in HSA wins the U.S. healthcare system or its affordability dilemma. However, the bill’s proposal may still be a victory for HSA account holders, Jake Spiegel, senior research assistant at the Employee Welfare Institute, a think tank, examines retirement, health, and financial benefits Americans receive from work.

Spiegel pointed out that the changes proposed for HSA are not "radical starts." “With that being said, even on the edge, this can be very useful for some people.”

HSA is used with health insurance plans that have a deductible above a certain price tag, called a high deduction health plan. This year, the threshold for individual plans is $1,650 and the household coverage is $3,300.

Some healthcare experts say insurance accounts should give users a tax-effective way to pay for medical expenses. Financial planners such as Toberman also praised the accounts as a "triple game" to minimize one's tax bill.

Salary deposited in the HSA is pre-tax payment and there are also deductions for people who put money into accounts other than their employer. HSA funds can be kept in cash or invested in stock markets, such as 401(k) retirement accounts.

This money is tax-free and when used for qualified medical expenses, the allocation is tax-free. (The fine is 20% when the expenses are not related to medical services.) After the age of 65, the fine disappears, but the distribution of non-medical expenses is still counted as ordinary income.

The biggest change in tax bills is the increase in donation restrictions. This year, the limit for individuals is $4,300, and the coverage for households is $8,550, while account holders aged 55 and older can add $1,000.

The bill would double the amount of donations. Although there are no income limits now who can contribute to the HSA, the bill will limit the additional income of who can add an additional $4,300/$8,550, which is indexed by inflation. The stage begins with $75,000 adjusted gross income and $150,000 for those with family coverage.

Income-based phase-out is a hallmark of the Republican bill.

Among other notable changes, older persons over 65 years of age can participate in Part A but will still contribute to the HSA. Spiegel pointed out that under current laws, they cannot. He said the additional contribution time and additional losses could help older workers who are facing substantial medical expenses or expected later.

See: This is the biggest retirement worries of Generation X - not money

Toberman said how much money is allocated for future medical needs is a major financial variable. He modeled the client’s future funding needs, often “medical expenses become the largest expense category.”

Toberman told clients to contribute to the employer's 401(k) competition and provided an overinvestment for the long-term investment of HSA while trying to pay for medical expenses from their pockets.

He said people are likely to be stuffed with too much money when HSA is “given the amazing growth rate of health care costs.” ”

What Spiegel calls HSAS called HSAS's "wealth maximization strategy." But most HSA users don't handle them this way, he added.

He said less than 15% of account holders contributed the statutory largest maximum measure. Even if HSA funds are used for investment rather than cash, most users still distribute on their accounts, “this is not in line with this strategy to maximize wealth.”

Michael Cannon, director of health policy research at the Cato Institute, a liberal-leaning think tank, said some potential changes in the HSA in the Republican tax bill were "meaningful."

Then there are bills that offer HSA funds to “qualified sports and fitness expenses.” According to Cannon, the bill cap allows a single filer to cost $500 and a co-reporter of $1,000, but this is an example of how taxes distort and complicate health care.

“Congress will also expand the definition over time to include sneakers and so on?” Cannon said. “It’s stupid because it’s about medical treatment.”

He said that while there are some HSA-related ideas Cannon supports, the Republican bill does not address the obvious flaws in health care.

"In general, this bill is irresponsible," Cannon added, because it is not enough to curb the costs and national debt incurred by programs such as Medicare and Medicaid.

Katherine Hempstead, a senior policy officer at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, a charity focused on public health, is worried that the country will “regain coverage.”

HSA is a "symptom of overcomplexity in our system," she said. It would be valuable if financial plans using these accounts could help people avoid selling homes and assets or ending up in “Medicaid-funded nursing homes.”

“The broader rule for HSA is “secondary help,” Hempstead said, “The problem is that we still live in a world where not everyone has affordable health coverage.” ”