When President Donald Trump levyed global import taxes last month, he said measures aimed at the right U.S. trade relations.

In his new deal with Britain, we have a glimpse of the kind of deal he might seek to negotiate around the world.

So far, both the U.S. and the U.K. have provided limited details about the new trade deal, both of which are still being formulated in the coming weeks.

But anyone who hopes the White House will overturn its tariffs significantly — or win major offers abroad — will seem disappointed.

Trump's 10% import tax on most British goods last month will remain unchanged, according to an outline proposed Thursday.

Otherwise, these plans mainly constitute the White House agreement that they agree to return some of the import taxes it reveals on strategic departments such as automobiles and steel.

In exchange, the White House said it won the change (unspecified) that would expand the UK's chances of selling American beef, ethanol and other agricultural products.

"The actual substantive projects they negotiated were very narrow," said Stan Veuger, senior researcher at Economic Policy Studies at the American Enterprise Institute. "In a sense, you could say they basically achieved the status quo, made marginal changes, and called it a deal."

The Trump administration has caused panic in its tariff announcement, eager to sell the announcement as an important one and describes it as a "breakthrough."

In the UK, Sir Keir Starmer also has the motivation to be seen as a solid negotiator, calling it "historic", while pointing out that there is more work to be done.

UK steelmakers and auto companies did express relief, saying the tariff rollback would help save work.

But few people missed anyone, despite the progress, UK goods still face higher tariffs than they did a few weeks ago.

In the U.S., most analysts agree that substantive benefits will be restricted despite discussions between the two sides over the past decade.

Mr Weger noted that Trump was equally willing to declare a trade victory with China, Mexico and Canada during his first term, which experts likewise said would have a slight impact.

"I think for Trump the goal is to reach a deal, and the actual appearance is not important," he said. "It tells me that it is not difficult to reach a deal, but it also tells me that there is not much room for change."

Thursday's announcement drew unusually sharp condemnation from U.S. automakers that pointed out that the import prices of these plans are cheaper than imports for many models whose companies operate in Mexico and Canada.

Other analysts objected to the president's sarcasm, dismissing concerns about the doll's tariffs raising prices while agreeing to lower imports of super-affluent cars, such as Rolls-Royces and British companies (British companies).

The National CATTLEMEN Beef Association said it welcomed the deal, but other groups representing farmers were a key part of Trump's political foundation, which was clearly downplayed.

The USDA Federation called it a "important first step" while noting that "more work is needed."

“It’s a good deal for American farmers…but it ends up being a pretty narrow framework,” said Lewis Lukens, former acting U.S. ambassador to the UK and vice president of the U.S. Embassy in London, who is part of Trump’s first semester.

“This has brought Trump political victory and there is not much real performance.”

Traditionally, Republicans were a free trade party that quickly celebrated the achievement.

Adrian Smith, a Republican of Nebraska, chaired the Trade Subcommittee, told the BBC that he was "satisfied" with the initial trade agreement.

"This is an important step to remove barriers to U.S. products in foreign markets," he said.

The announcement said the White House was “desperate” in tariffs before causing serious economic losses to ease its tariffs, said Paul Ashworth, chief North American economist at capital economics, in a notice after the press conference.

These economic risks do not come from the UK, but the relationship between the US and China, which sent more than $40 billion worth of goods to the US last year, more than six times that of the UK.

Trump has raised import taxes on Chinese products to at least 145%, prompting Beijing to retaliate against its responsibilities for American goods.

Trade flows between the two countries have dropped sharply since last month, with fears that tariffs will not only lead to price increases, as widely predicted, but also shortages.

The two sides will hold their first negotiations this weekend, but what will happen is still unclear.

Meanwhile, Trump's suspension of some of the highest tariffs announced last month to partners such as the EU, Vietnam and Cambodia is 90 days, and there is a clock at this moment.

Trump looked regretful earlier this week when reporters asked about his trade talks.

"Everyone said, 'When, when, when to sign the deal?' "I hope they will... stop asking. ”

But this announcement with Britain seems unlikely to be one that will pull critics back.

Report contributed by BBC TV and Max Matza's "Context"