Dua Lipa, Sir Elton John, Sir Ian McKellen and Sir Ian McKellen and Florence Welch are all star lists calling on the Prime Minister to update their copyright laws in a way that protects them from artificial intelligence.

A letter signed by more than 400 British musicians, writers and artists went to Sir Keir Starmer, who said the failure to give protection would mean they were “gifting” their work to tech companies.

They wrote that there is equally risky "British status as a creative power."

They want the PM to make corrections to the data (use and access) bill, which will require developers to contact the copyright owner about the transparency of using their materials to train AI models.

A government spokesman said: “We want our creative industries and AI companies to flourish, which is why we are consulting a range of measures and hope we want both sectors to work.

They added: "We are very clear that no changes will be considered unless we are completely satisfied that they work for the creators."

Other signatories include author Kazuo Ishiguro, playwright David Hare, singers Kate Bush and Robbie Williams, as well as Coldplay, Tom Stoppard and Richard Curtis.

Sir Paul McCartney told the BBC in January that he was worried about Ai's deprivation of artists, and he also signed the letter.

It says: “We are wealth creators, we reflect and promote national stories, we are future innovators, and artificial intelligence requires our strength and computer skills,” it requires us. ”

They said that the government would support an amendment proposed by Baroness Beeban Kidron ahead of a major vote in the House of Lords on Monday, which could satisfy their concern.

It said the Baroness’s amendment would “allow AI developers and creators to develop licensing systems that will make future artificially created content good.”

Not everyone agrees with the artist’s approach.

Julia Willemyns, co-founder of the Centre for Progressive Council of the UK, said such recommendations could hinder the growth of the UK and its bids.

She told the BBC that the measures would “not help, preventing foreign companies from using content from the UK’s creative industry”.

"The restrictive copyright system will be developed in AI, calming domestic innovation and directly harming the UK economy," she said.

However, the letter is amid an increasing ongoing focus on the inclusion of his work and copyrighted materials in the data used to develop and generate AI systems.

These tools can generate new content based on simple text prompts and have become increasingly popular and available for consumers.

But their capabilities are accompanied by concern and criticism of data use and energy demand.

In February, artists including Annie Lennox and Damon Albarn released a silent album in protest of the government's proposed changes to copyright law.

The government consulted on its proposals to allow developers to use creators’ content on the internet to help develop their models unless the rights holder opts out.

Ministers are reconsidering proposals after the creators rebound, according to The Guardian.

Mr Ishiguro pointed out the BBC's earlier statement, writing: "Why is fair and fair - why is wise - to change our long-standing copyright laws at the expense of individual writers, musicians, filmmakers and artists at the expense of Mammoth Company?"

The Nobel Prize-winning author added that since then, the only limited advancement is that it now appears unlikely that the government has accepted the proposal to opt out, and he believes that a new consultation to find a more equitable plan is possible, although it still sees meaningfulness in any consultation.

“They have to do this right,” he wrote.

Members of Congress recently rejected another amendment carried out by Baroness Maroness Kidron, which aims to keep AI developers accountable for UK copyright law.

Now, under the newly proposed amendment, the transparency obligations for tech companies can support the development of a licensing agreement between the creator and the company.

"The UK is a unique position for players around the world in the international AI supply chain, but grasping this opportunity requires the transparency set out in my amendment, which is crucial to establishing a vibrant licensing market," the Baroness said.

In their statement, the government said: “It is crucial that we take the time to work on the scope of response to the consultation, but it is equally important that we present the basic work immediately when we consider the next step.

“That’s why we are committed to publishing reports and economic impact assessments, exploring various issues and options in all aspects of debate.”