As a part of NBC program, many years of operation Database Franchise rights, Predator It is not criticized or litigant, but it must be insulating.
Of course, you may say that each episode is a trap of careful planning. The relationship between reporters and law enforcement departments becomes blurred, and the relationship between reporters and law enforcement departments should never become blurred.
Bottom line Complex review of popular songs that Volkswagen loves.
Place: St. Dandas Film Festival (American Documentary Competition Unit)
director: David Osite
1 hour and 36 minutes
"What, do you agree with sex predators?" Then fans of the show will reply
It is difficult to make detailed dialogue from there.
In his new Saint -Dathan premiere documentary PredatorsDirector David Osit has made full use of more than 17 years of experience Predator Try to make these conversations.
As a result, a 96 -minute movie, some people feel disappointing, and it actually talks about disappointment, because when you sit down and watch Predators It is required to be a solution or vent.
If you belong to "this show is always disgusting, it is the kind of self -defense and ambush TV popular in the early 00, before it penetrates into the entire society" camp, you will want to be completely condemned when watching -the method of the show , Its legal effect and the cute Hoshiko host Chrisham.
If you come from "there are almost no absolute morals in this world, but there is a" camp here, you will watch and want to be verified, proves that everyone related to the show is a pure motivation and the righteous mission of the show. Can be measured in matrix terms.
Osite has his agenda. With the progress of the documentary, this agenda has become more and more part of the dialogue, but his task is between the two. He just wanted to understand this phenomenon. Although Hanson often repeated the slogan "Let me understand ...", this phenomenon never understood.
I found that the uncertainty of this documentary is effective in many aspects of Osite's obvious intentions, but I don't always respond to Osite's method.
like Predator itself, Predators Quietly attract the audience.
This documentary is divided into three labels. The first part is played to those who miss the show. Many of them have a fragment that Hanson confronts the predator kitchen. These clips have cheered some audiences. We introduced us to several "bait" in this series, including women and a man. They seem to be young and sound, enough to seduce potential predators into houses taken through multiple angles. There, Hansen suddenly appeared in his iconic way, and said that he was familiar with "you can obviously go", and then the local law enforcement department would arrest the perpetrator.
The first bait we encountered seemed to be amused by her role in this series, so that we later saw her at a real crime conference and eagerly greeted Hansen. Hansen was considered conquest. hero. The second bait we encountered was not ashamed of what she did, but she couldn't see the episode. Then we encountered Dan, and he was involved in the infamous Texas incident. The incident eventually led a regional prosecutor to commit suicide and directly or indirectly caused the play to be canceled.
When Osite met with the law enforcement department in cooperation with the show and the Texas media, which reported the unfortunate incident, when he revealed the uneasy behind -the -scenes shots obtained through the uneasy source, he began Never dominate. Essence
The second part focuses on the imitators, including Skeeter Jean, a ambush person on a YouTube. He lacks the real Hanson's qualifications and general professional spirit, but he likes to name T-COY in T-COY The help of bait ambush others. Skit made this show out of fanatical fans -he felt that other ambusing host did not have the irony and seriousness of Chris Hansen, so he decided to try to copy it.
T-Coy's motivation is complicated, and the reasons for making this movie are consistent with OSIT. The latter tries to gently promote what people think about Predator This is true, and whether you can do the right thing in the wrong way, or whether this basic and satisfactory purpose always proves that it is reasonable.
Osite tried to push Hanson in the third part of the documentary, where you can see Osite's disappointment most vividly and truly. He wants to get something from the entire shooting experience -he has personal reasons to get it, and he knows when it will not meet the requirements. This is why Oste almost no one knows from outside the camera, and finally became the focus. It was also at that time, Oste no longer seriously relying on low -energy ethnic scholars to simply say what film producers need to say.
Osite's method is very convincing, but I want to know if he has left some experience cards. He does not advocate specific pity or compassion for sex predators, but it is just a common sense of empathy. But maybe a more news method can generate specific data on convictions PredatorThe specific type of treatment of the guidance, or the "predator" is not just punishment.
Obviously, this is not the rhetoric strategy that Oste believes the best resonance, so since this kind of dialogue has been established, this may be the next step. Predators Not a documentary about closing the door Predator Heritage, but by observing the shadow of gray, we can find that the door is now ready to open again.