The Democratic National Committee subcommittee on Monday recommended that the group invalidate the deputy votes of a vice chairman in February, claiming that it was unfair.

Unless the entire DNC votes for approval, the move will not be formal, and it may open new games for the positions held by Florida activist David Hogg and Malcolm Kenyatta.

The challenge of Oklahoma Democratic Committee Women’s Committee, Kalyn Free, who competed against Hogg and Kenyatta in February’s vice-chairman, had nothing to do with the ongoing tensions between Hogg and the National Party as he pushed for a push to support the main challenge for the incumbent Democratic Party.

Instead, this is based on the freedom claim that the handling of the vice-chairman’s vote gave the two men an unfair advantage in the NPC executive committee’s requirement to achieve gender balance.

Nevertheless, the DNC Certificate Committee's Monday night vote set a high-profile decision for the KMT in the coming weeks, as it will now be voted by all agencies in order to see whether to call on Hogg and Kennetta to serve as vice-chairmanship.

It all happened because DNC chairman Ken Martin has been working on a reform that would “requir all parties (including myself) to remain neutral primary” because Hogg has been saying he intends to stand on the side.

DNC rules require the KMT executive committee to "should be divided as feasible as the gender boundaries." (If the committee includes members who identify as non-binary, they don't count for the purposes of gender division.) As DNC members met earlier this year for the multi-hour process of voting in a new slate of officers, the vote for the three vice chairs being the last position to be filled, it became clear that the party needed to elect at least one man to the final two vice chair spots to maintain the required gender equity on the seven-person executive committee.

Then the party Decide to make a vote to decide on the last two slots instead of having separate votes for each position.

Free claims that the merger vote unfairly benefited Hog and Kenyatta, the only two people, as members had to vote for at least one man in the merger vote. She believes that if the votes are separated, they may vote in different votes.

Pay attention to the on-site political reports here

Representatives of Hogg and Kenyatta disagree with the challenge, believing that the party has shortened the long voting process in real time within its discretionary rights.

this The challenge of challenging the DNC election dates back to late February, just before the division between Hogg and the party, challenged. But now, more than 400 members of the DNC will have to vote on whether to call for a new election, which could make Hogg's position in this context.

Hogg noted in a statement Monday night that the issue was about how national parties handle the election, and he and Kenyatta had no allegations that he did anything wrong. He added: “It is also impossible to ignore the broader context of my work to reform the parties that voted this time.”

"I ran to serve as DNC vice-chairman to help make the Democratic Party better than defending the irrefutable status quo that keeps almost every demographic group away from us," he said.

Kenyatta posted on social media that when he respected the vote, he disagreed with the committee's decision, calling it "a slap on my face."

He also considered some representations of the vote as the latest vote in the legend between Hogg and the Party.

"I worked hard to take on this role, working every day," he said in a long thread on X. "The story is complicated and I'm frustrated - but it's not about (David Hogg). Even if he obviously wants to do that."

In a statement issued after the vote, Martin said the strict debate was about the failure of parliamentary processes and the debate he was seeking to decide on.

"During the presidential campaign, I promised to run the DNC with integrity, openness and fairness. I was disappointed to learn that there were procedural errors in the February vice-chair election before I became chairman," he said.

He added: "The Certificate Committee has issued their recommendations and I believe DNC members will carefully review the committee's solutions and resolve this issue fairly."

The decision was held for a three-hour virtual meeting on the party’s YouTube page, which was held at a party, which was extended for a longer period as the 18-member committee was linked to the first vote, which sparked another round of debate. The committee's membership has been appointed by former KMT chairman Jaime Harrison, not the new appointment of the new chairman.

Ultimately, the party that supported the new election proposal for the main opponents, and with the support of 13 members, approved the resolution, announcing the election of the vice-chair seats for Hog and Kenyatta to be "incomplete". It recommended that the DNC hold new elections for two seats in "One Viable" and only candidates are eligible for the final vote of the party. Hogg and Kenyatta will be allowed to run again, but that's not what they won.

Mark Mallory, a member of the Certificate Committee and mayor of Cincinnati, said at the meeting that he supported the decision because “our former chairman did not do anything to deliberately deprive any candidates running for vice-chairmen. But that’s how it turns out.”

Mallory puts the process with the process of a patient with a fractured leg that must reset the bones in the hospital.

"This process is also painful, but it's part of the initial recovery of the incident," he said. "I believe it's our responsibility to take action."