California MPs have approved millions of lawsuits against Trump

After the Special Meeting of Gavin Newsom (Gavin Newsom), after the end of Monday, the California legislature approved a $ 50 million to provide funds to the Trump administration's courts and support migrants to provide legal services.

The Governor is expected to sign legislation quickly without a feast to try to reduce the narrative of California and Trump, and his special meeting is his special meeting. Essence

"Make me bluntly. Now, the Californians are threatened by a Washington family's out of control. The speaker of the conference Robert Rivas (D-Hollister) said that our own residents were threatened by the actions adopted by the Trump administration. This is our responsibility.

The conference approved the two bills on Monday afternoon. The Senate approved the legislation last month.

For nearly three months after Newsom launched a special meeting, the Democrats of the State Parliament Building passed the bill, saying that "our freedom in California was attacked" and the days after President Trump's victory in November.

The decision is largely symbolic, and it conveys a message nationwide, that is, Newsom is preparing to lead the Democratic Party to "resist" to return to Trump's conservative policy agenda.

However, since he has actively announced, the governor has been trying to reduce his position and have achieved a subtle balance between defending the country and cooperation with the president.

After litting the fire in Los Angeles County, Newsom expanded special conferences to the rapid traffic of $ 2.5 billion to the affected community. Although Newsom originally said that legal funds must be approved before the inauguration ceremony, the legislators still postponed the final approval of the funds of the court to this week.

Several Republicans joined Democrats to vote for wildfire funds. However, they said that after governor and president met at the apron at the Los Angeles International Airport last month and promised to recover together, the wrong legal struggle was used to send wrong information. This is not a "sincere symbol".

"I think that when we still have no residents at home, the bills at this time are incredible deaf people, relief and prevention.

Democratic party legislators defended the law and pointed out that Trump's administrative order ended the identity of maternity citizenship, the federal deportation of the country and trying to suspend fed funds. This is an example of strengthening state defense.

Representative Burbank and Glendale's Democratic Nick Schultz said: "I am more afraid of everything I see about me in my life." "Therefore, I, I Support the governor's proposal, because someone must stand up. In addition to California and other 21 states, and some non -profit organizations participating in the battle, who else will oppose the right to execute without inspection? "

The legislation enhanced the national budget for 2024-15 years and authorized the Journalism Commission to provide a defense of up to $ 25 million to the California Department of Justice to defend the execution of California and legal lawsuits adopted by the federal government.

What is increased is that more legal struggles between the countries and the Trump administration in the first term of the president and have recovered. California. General Rob Bonta joined nearly 20 states this week to oppose the government's lawsuit against federal fiscal aid. The judge temporarily stopped the withdrawal of a separate lawsuit.

This legislation puts over another $ 25 million, mainly providing legal services for "vulnerable Californians", including immigrants. They may face deportation, deportation, wages, family violence and other risks due to federal operations.

The money will be provided to the California Social Services Department of the California Social Service with the Gifts of the Legal Services Trust Fund and the Non -profit organizations of the California Judicial Committee.

The conference planned to pass the bill last week, but after the Republicans questioned whether the funding of immigrants may eventually support people with criminal records, they delayed their voting. Members submitted a letter to the bill, clarifying that the funds were not aimed at providing services to those who were convicted or severe.

Anabel Sosa, a Times worker of Sacramando, contributed to the report.