After a year and a half of the year and a half of the Gaza War, Britain finally seemed to have lost patience with Israel.

Prime Minister Sir Kyle Stamer and Foreign Minister David Lammy told the MPs that it sounded angry.

Sir Kyle said the degree of suffering in Gaza, especially among innocent children, is "unbearable".

He said Israel's decision to allow a small amount of aid was "totally inadequate."

The Prime Minister added that Israel's decision to escalate its military campaign was "shocked".

Lammy uses similar language to say that the situation in Gaza is "abnormal".

He condemned Israel's tough finance minister Bezalel Smotrich's suggestion as "terrible" that the civilian population in Gaza should be cleaned up.

Rami said Israel’s actions were to isolate Israel from friends and partners around the world and “destroy the image of the State of Israel in the eyes of the world.”

Nor is the UK in expressions of anger or threats to concrete action.

The EU said it is reviewing its association agreement with Israel, which governs its political and economic relations.

The EU's foreign policy head Kaja Kallas said the "strong majority" members favored another study of the 25-year-old agreement.

On Monday night, Britain joined France and Canada to sign a strongly worded joint statement condemning Israel’s military operations and warning “further concrete actions” if the humanitarian situation in Gaza does not agree.

It was followed by another statement signed by 27 donor countries, including the United Kingdom, condemning the Israeli-promoted model of New Gaza aid delivery.

The model aims to replace existing humanitarian agencies, including civilian contractors supported by the Israeli military.

The United Nations and its donors say the new model is poorly conceived and politically motivated to replace the decades of tested and tested international humanitarian ecosystems.

A representative of one of the aid agencies running in Gaza told me that the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation plans were “totally premature” and added that Israel never provided evidence to support its claim that Hamas is responsible for the widespread transfer of aid.

A Western diplomat cited a new model in the Israeli liberal Harlez newspaper, "crazy plans and absolute madness."

In a passionate debate in the House of Commons, Rami clashed with his conservatives in the opposite numbers, and he suggested that Hamas benefit from international criticism of Israel.

Rami accused her of refusing to face the reality of what is going on in Gaza.

Other MPs said Britain had insufficient progress and several again suggested that Britain had arrived in a Palestinian state.

The government’s view is that taking such an important step for purely symbolic reasons does not actually change anything.

But as France may recognize Palestine at a meeting co-chaired with Saudi Arabia next month, some hope Britain will follow suit.

Even if it is not the case, it is clear that Israeli supporters are growing angry and worried that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's latest military operation, known as the "chariot of Gideon", is preparing to pile up pain on Gaza, just as the two million civilians in the region are facing real shock.

Even U.S. President Donald Trump expressed impatience, warning that “a lot of people are hungry” as he ended his regional tour last week.

Netanyahu's government has lost support even among Israel's most determined allies.

At the World Jewish Congress meeting in Jerusalem, the group's president, Ronald Lauder, challenged Israel's Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar.

"All the best things Israel does have been destroyed by Smotridge because his claims about starving Gaza people and causing damage are broadcast worldwide," Lauder said.

According to senior Israeli journalist Ben Caspit, Saal's answer is brief.

“Formal point.”