If Anthony Albanese had less than a majority in Saturday's election, he would not have signed a written deal with any cross-bencher, confirming that Labor would rather negotiate with itemized legislation than equity with the Greens, independents or secondary parties.

The Prime Minister reiterated the post in a appearance at the National News Club on Wednesday, where he summed up the re-election stadium and then launched a blitz in all six states in a final effort to beat undecided voters in the key seats.

Dutton runs in Dunkley, Chisholm and Aston, three workforce seats in the Melbourne suburbs, and the league is desperate to win.

Albanis and Dutton both face questions about a possible share of the deal with the cross bench as polls show that the unresolved parliament remains a realistic possibility.

Dutton had previously appointed Bob Katter, Dai Le and Allegra Spender as potential partners in an open parliament – ​​shrugging at the question of possible deals with a country after arrangements with bipartisan preferences.

He did not answer whether the league would seek support from a country in the Senate.

"I won't be with independents and third parties in this election. I really won't," Dutton said.

When asked if one country leader Pauline Hanson would get a cabinet location under the coalition government, Dutton replied: “Of course not.”

Albanis refused to look at the prospect of hanging parliament throughout the campaign, and his only focus was to retain a majority government.

The Prime Minister specifically and repeatedly ruled out formal agreements with the Greens, such as Julia Gillard and Bob Brown Ink to support the minority government after the 2010 election.

If Labor falls into a minority government on Saturday with Albanese taking his position, the government will need to negotiate with individual inter-arrangers to pass House and Senate legislation.

Given the Prime Minister's own importance to stability in an increasingly uncertain global environment, Albany asked on Wednesday whether the official deal would be preferred.

In response, Albanis said: "No."

He said: "Did we see the kind of agreement that we used to see? No."

The Prime Minister pointed out that despite only 25 out of 76 seats in the House of Lords, the government managed to pass the "most" of its first agenda.

He used his press club speech in Canberra to frame the election as a competition between “two fundamentally different visions of Australia’s response direction”.

He told the audience, including Senior Minister Richard Marles, Jim Chalmers, Katy Gallagher, Mark Butler and Tony Burke.

“Go back to the darker, more agile, more extreme versions of cuts, conflict and cultural wars that people refused less than three years ago.”

In a wide Q&A session, Albanese raised questions about tax reforms that require higher incomes, refused to directly answer whether Australians were worse than they were three years ago, and defended Labour’s claim that the Dutton government would have intestinal health insurance.

In the coalition’s comments to Foreign Minister Penny Wong, claiming that labor is intended to one day restore voice to parliament, he also faces questions about the future of Aboriginal recognition.

Wong compared Indigenous advisory agencies to marriage equality when talking about the Betoota Talks podcast, a social reform that was ultimately achieved after a long struggle.

Huang did not say Labor intends to revive the proposal, and Albanys announced that he was asked in time to "do it" during Sunday's leaders' debate.

But Dutton claims that the reelected Labor government will try to legislate versions of the body.

He claimed: "If you want to know what the government is doing to the greens, if they are elected, they will introduce the voice through legislation. We will stop it. So if you want to vote for Labour and the Greens, you will get the voice."

Albanis spoke at the press club again defended the referendum, which was rejected by 60% of voters.

“I did it out of faith and not out of convenience,” he said.

Albanis said the Labor Party respected the results of the October 2023 vote and is now focusing on what he calls a "practical reconciliation."

"How do we close the gap? The truth is, every government, labor and conservative person is not doing well enough," he said.