Experts say Trump's blitzkrieg is a direct threat to democracy. Trump administration

Legal experts say Donald Trump's series of executive orders include many aimed at expanding his presidential powers to threaten the rule of law and democratic norms in the United States.

Trump's order includes a sudden launch of 17 institutional regulators without 30-day notice to Congress, refusing birthright citizenship for children who immigrate undocumented, which is guaranteed by the 14th Amendment to them in 1 Role in the Capitol Uprising on 6th of the month.

Congressional Republicans have little criticism of Trump's power play, but Democrats have accelerated attacks on Trump's moves: About two dozen Democratic state attorney generals have filed lawsuits, federal court judges temporarily halted Trump More extremist moves.

Guardians have learned that a group of inspectors are also expected to file a lawsuit, challenging Trump's firing and are in conversation with law firms, according to sources familiar with the matter.

The federal judge supported the general litigation of state prosecutors and separate litigation by civil rights groups, halting Trump’s efforts to cancel birthright citizenship for children with undocumented immigrants, an aspect of his blitz to deport undocumented immigrants.

Similarly, after the White House Budget Office issued a directive that could briefly block $300 million in federal funds from being sent to numerous states and federal programs, 23 state attorneys general convinced two federal judges to temporarily block This measure takes effect.

Additionally, Congressional Democrats and unions are challenging some of the tough cost-cutting measures pursued by Trump’s biggest donor and the world’s wealthiest man Elon Musk, pursuing in the so-called “Doctor of Government Efficiency” (DOGE) , the operation is facing what is called “government efficiency” (Doge), which is facing shooting it covers up the U.S. international development agencies.

Legal experts say Trump's execution actions are designed to strengthen the president's power and may be intended to file certain cases in the Supreme Court, hoping that the conservative majority will rule his broad view of the enforcement power.

“At the bottom, President Trump’s executive order opening ceremony Salvo is not the same as his administration’s view of the executive branch, but rather dominant in all three branches,” former federal judge John Jones ) is now Dickinson College, said John John Jones. Likewise, his administration chose to simply ignore the laws it considers unconstitutional.

“I believe that those with status, such as the state attorney general, will increasingly challenge these orders in court. I hope that a constitutional equal judiciary will be a bastion and prevent further deterioration of the rule of law.”

Arizona Democratic Attorney General Kris Mayes echoed this view, who believes the state attorney general played a key role in stopping certain Trump’s moves.

“We will not hesitate to challenge actions that violate the Constitution or threaten fundamental rights, and we will win,” Metz said.

Former Justice Department officials also made harsh criticisms of Trump's rapid action to expand his authority. “Trump is determined to maximize the power of the presidency,” said former federal prosecutor Ty Cobb.

“He thinks he is omnipotent, and he can't blame anything he does. Obviously not. He has no ability to amend the Constitution by executive orders.”

Cobb predicts: “Nothing will slow Trump down. He will test the limits of his power until he leaves the office.”

Many of Trump's execution orders were foreshadowed in his campaign, but the appearance of its quantity and speed was designed to drown out political enemies and echoed the call of former Trump strategist Steve Bannon flood the area” to overwhelm democratic opposition and media attacks.

Trump has defended his inspector general's dismissal by mistakenly calling it “standard” and “very common thing.” Similarly, Trump has unfounded claims that those convicted are victims of the “weapons” of the Justice Department, whose victims have defended their pardons that have committed “serious state injustice.”

On another battlefield of the Justice Department, about a dozen senior lawyers, Jack Smith, work for Jack Smith, who accused Trump of trying to illegally overturn his 2020 losses to Joe Byr Joe Biden is synchronized with Trump's threat of revenge on his political enemy.

Former federal prosecutor and legal expert said some of Trump's executive measures are undermining the rule of law, but are in line with his authoritarian instinct and plans to expand executive power.

“It seems like Trump is pushing, sometimes beyond his authority limits to drive the legal boundaries,” said Barbara McQuade, a former Eastern Michigan Attorney.

“By ignoring legal requirements before firing the attorney general and career prosecutors, Trump is inviting lawsuits, which in turn has the opportunity to challenge regulations that limit the president’s authority to fire executive employees.”

In response to some of Trump’s suspicious powers, Senate Democrats and a Republican member have stepped up their challenge to Trump’s measures to expand power.

Two senior senators on the Judiciary Committee, Democrat Dick Durbin and Republican Chuck Grassley, reprimanded Trump in a joint letter Tuesday for his sudden firing 17 inspectors were tasked with eliminating waste, fraud and abuse in federal agencies.

“Under the law, Congress did not provide 30-day notice required by law and reasons for dismissal in a particular case. Therefore, we ask you to provide this information immediately,” Grasley and Durbin wrote.

“While IG is not immune to committing a claim to be removed, so the president can remove it, but the law must be followed.”

The letter stressed the need to give Congress “enough facts and details to ensure that Congress and the public terminated was due to real concerns about the inspector’s ability to perform his tasks.”

Before the letter was sent, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt nervously justified Trump's inspector general's mass shooting, telling reporters: “He is the executive officer of the executive branch, so He has the right to fire anyone inside the administration he wishes to.”

Meanwhile, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a Democratic Massachusetts, issued an alarm about the threat posed by Musk's governor, amid his enthusiasm for lower costs, which has received access tax refunds and social security checks the Ministry of Finance system.

“Donald Trump and Elon Musk aren't cutting costs for working families, but messing up your system of taxes and social security checks,” Warren said. It's not like the usual thing. We live in a nightmare created by Donald Trump and I'm going to fight back as much as I can.”

Two large federal employee unions filed a lawsuit in federal court on Monday against government charges that sharing Treasury payment information with Doge violated the 1974 Privacy Act.

Some former participants said Trump's method of committing the crime was only to strengthen his executive authority and straightforward opposition without having to worry about legal goodwill.

Former federal prosecutor Paul Rosenzweig said: “Trump and his team clearly have plans to control the federal government – not in the normal way of most transitions, but deliberately eliminate the opposition and surrender. According to his wishes.”

“Trump also intends to make the opposition – both from independent regulators such as the IGS and from ordinary people.”

Legal experts say Trump's actions are likely to lead to a Supreme Court test case, which could rule the president's support given the court's six to three conservative majority.

Commentators noted that last year, the court passed a controversial and broad ruling to Trump for a huge victory that any “official” action by the president during his tenure was exempted.

“Trump may hope he can expand the presidency given the recent view of executive power in the Supreme Court,” McQuid said.

Rosenzweig also stressed that some of Trump's actions, such as his firing of the National Labor and Industrial Relations Committee, “are obviously intended to develop a test case and obtain approval from the Supreme Court.”

But Trump's crusade to overturn power restrictions by executing orders could face more obstacles.

“It's very easy to issue a series of execution orders in the creepy claims of executive power,” said Daniel Richman, a Columbia law professor and former federal prosecutor.

“But now, the action will be partially transferred to the courts, where democracies AG and others are committed to showing the weakness of these claims. Trump believes he can succumb to his will, which will also be transferred to the bureaucracy.”

Other legal experts believe that Trump has increased his power ahead of schedule.

“Trump seems anxious to test the ease with which he ignores our laws and constitution when it gets in the way of hindering his agenda,” said Larry Noble, former general counsel for the French Election Commission, who now teaches the law. In an American university.

“So far, most congressional Republicans seem content to be in another way that effectively put Congress in control of the two houses to provide rubber stamps for Trump’s orders rather than one of the three common branches of the administration. , aiming to check the president's attempt to check to become a monarch.”