Elated, chaotic Mark Israel’s reaction to Trump’s Gaza comments | Donald Trump News

Chaos, with some elated rulers ruled in Israel’s public and political class, it is unclear what U.S. President Donald Trump’s comment on Gaza really means.

The idea makes sense for the extreme right and hyper-Orthodox factions of Israeli politics – the population displacement of Gaza to make the United States monitor what they think is ultimately some kind of reconstruction of the Israeli people.

However, some analysts have seen the dysfunction of Trump's bombing rhetoric about land, whose people have lived, noting that such brute force can easily apply to Israelis in illegal settlements in the West Bank of Palestine.

A Israel Channel 13 poll showed that while 72% of Israelis liked the idea of ​​U.S. President Donald Trump’s view of U.S. control of the Gaza Strip, only 35% believed it would be implemented.

It is also unclear to observers of Israeli politics how Trump's ready-made rhetoric is with the end of the months between Hamas and Israel at the end of the months after the Israeli Infinity War on Gaza , how to match the three-phase ceasefire agreement.

promise

Believing that Palestine is a certain sacred right of Israel is a defense of actions claimed by politicians and other movements held a meeting last January to discuss colonization of Gaza.

The ceasefire agreement (which means Israel must stop bombing Gaza, disappointing that it seems that the attacks will continue until Israel can claim extreme rights throughout the enclave.

In the construction of the deal signed on January 17, Smotrich and Ben-Gvir both threatened to resign against their conditions.

Only Ben-Gvir resigned, but he left his Otzma Yehudit party in the Council Alliance, which made his move manifest for many observers.

Smotrich was “persuaded” in exchange for Netanyahu's assurance that he had no intention of cashing out the deal signed with Hamas and resuming the war after the first phase was completed.

desire

At first glance, Trump's quirky ideas seem to offer the ultimate goal of controlling Gaza.

“Trump is progressing much further than anyone expected,” Israeli poller Mitchell Barak told senior Israeli figures including Netanyahu.

“In the short term, what Trump has to offer is better than what Smotrich and Ben-Gvir hope.”

Ben-Gvir was quick to say that the possibility of ethnic cleansing Gaza might be enough to convince him to forget his past complaints and return to the government.

“We have a huge opportunity and we must not miss it,” he told Gali on Wednesday. “Some people have been engaged in it for a long time in Israel and have obtained such as 'Messiah and Delusion' Nick name.”

Nachala claims to be ready to capture the people of Gaza and is ethnically cleansed under the terms proposed by Trump.

But Barak noted: “They (to the far right of Israel) will not decide how this will end; Trump will, part of his plan, find a solution for the Palestinians. This may still involve some kind of two-state Solution.

Barack warned: “If Trump has the ability to reduce the population in Gaza, he also has the right to relocate Israelis from settlements.”

Puzzled

There are not many details in Trump's speech.

He did not say whether he was advocating a decades-long U.S. policy, demanding a two-state solution for Palestine if he suggested a temporary ethnic cleansing in Gaza, or how his ideas could get stuck in a three-stage ceasefire in a difficult negotiation .

Reports from The Times and other media show that without prior consultation by aides or allies, most of Trump's announcements appear to be made without knowing much of the international rebound of the country he proposed, And quickly warned the president. The plans of Secretary of State Marco Rubio and White House spokesman Karoline Leavitt clarified that the president's proposal is temporary and does not represent the U.S. military commitment to Gaza.

“Suppose we take Trump seriously,” Alon Pinkas, a former Israeli ambassador and government adviser, told Al Jazeera.

“Israel must commit to this deal and at least an agreement will be reached (when a population transfer occurs).

“Now, aren't we doing this? Hamas still has no motivation to stay in the ceasefire. Anyway, they and everyone else in Gaza will be eliminated. Where do they stay with the ceasefire agreement?

“Ben-Gvir, Smotrich and others are clear at least on what they want (ethnic cleansing in Gaza). They won't be because of Netanyahu ) is troubled by obscure concepts (such as international law).

Destroyer

If the United States is temporarily cleaning Gaza, Smotrich, Ben-Gvir and his allies will be closer than ever to their long-term hope for the colony.

As Pinkas suggested, Trump’s intervention led to a collapse of the ceasefire, and they would get a supportive return in the unrestrained Holocaust for at least 15 months.

In both cases, Netanyahu could defend the “Jewish homeland” he would form by a unified and merger cabinet or war leaders.

Barack suggested that even the threat of early elections could play the prime minister’s ending.

“The new election will make any government a transitional election,” he said, referring to various challenges facing the government, besides the potential threats posed by its rights, such as the upcoming budget and the drafting of Israel's ultra-Orthodox Church. Debate, “That means it doesn't have to overcome any obstacles. Anything that gives Netanyahu time is always good for him. He has done it before.”

“By putting the transfer plan on the table, Trump pushed Ben Giverill and Smotrich toward Netanyahu,” said Nimrod Flashenberg, an Israeli political analyst.

He continued: “Ben-Gvir said this brings him closer to the government back to the government, and Smotrich, if the final game is the ethnic cleansing in Gaza, there is a three-stage ceasefire.