Skip to content

Why Traditional Retirement Accounts Have Become the Worst Asset in Estate Planning

    Why Traditional Retirement Accounts Have Become the Worst Asset in Estate Planning

    Why Traditional Retirement Accounts Have Become the Worst Asset in Estate Planning

    Listen and subscribe to Decoding Retirement Apple Podcasts, Spotifyor wherever you find your favorite podcasts.

    Those saving for retirement have long viewed traditional Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs) as the ultimate savings vehicle, offering pre-tax savings, tax-free growth, and benefits for inherited IRA beneficiaries.

    However, Ed Slaughter, author of “The Noise of the Retirement Savings Time Bomb Gets Loud,” says people should stop thinking that way.

    Slaughter said on a recent episode of Decoding Retirement that recent legislative changes have taken away all the redeeming qualities of the IRA (see the video above or listen below). Now, he said, is “probably the worst asset to leave for beneficiaries to do wealth transfers, estate planning, or even take their own money.”

    Many American families have IRAs. According to the Investment Company Institute, 41.1 million U.S. households will have approximately $15.5 trillion in individual retirement accounts as of 2023, with traditional IRAs accounting for the largest share.

    Slott, widely regarded as America's IRA expert, explains that IRAs were a good idea when they were first created. “You can get tax deductions and the beneficiary can do what we used to call an extreme IRA,” he said. “So it has some good qualities.”

    But he went on to say that IRAs are always difficult to work with because of the minefield of distribution rules. “It's like an obstacle course, just to get your money out,” Slaughter said. “Your own money. This is ridiculous.”

    According to Slaughter, IRA account owners endure a minefield of rules because the benefits on the back end are a good deal. “But now those benefits are gone,” Slaughter said.

    IRAs were once particularly attractive because of their “stretch IRA” benefits, which allowed inherited IRA beneficiaries to stretch out required withdrawals for 30, 40 or even 50 years, potentially spreading the tax and allowing the account to grow tax-deferred for a longer period of time.

    However, recent legislative changes, notably the SECURE Act, which eliminated the extended IRA withdrawal strategy and replaced it with a 10-year rule that now requires most beneficiaries to withdraw the entire account balance within ten years, may result in Significant tax implications.

    Read more: 3 Ways Retirees Can Save Taxes

    Slaughter said the 10-year rule is a tax trap waiting to happen. If forced to take required minimum distributions (RMDs), many Americans may find themselves paying taxes on those withdrawals at a higher rate than they expected.

    Trump's first 100 days are the worst stock market since Nixon A reunião dos bispos exige partidos políticos “moralidade e responsabilidade” – sociedade The flame will appear again above the Pacific Palisades. This time, see what caused the deadly fire in January Rui Rocha acredita que não há “diferença significativa” entre anúncio e ps Trump's order ends funding for universities that authorize Covid Vax “Não estamos descartando nada no momento”. A Comissão Europeia não tem evidências online White House lawn lined with a dew-sand style poster showing arrested immigrants allegedly committed crime Duarte Gomes analisa a arbitragem de bombas de boavista Leading baby food brands make high-sugar meals, research discovery | Kids Imagens mostram longas filas no supermercado após a queda de energia – vídeo